2016 star tournament

[B-Stealth]

Originally Posted by "W"

I support facts and data
If you can provide legit data to back a limt reduction im all for it but when "I" ask the CCA president why did he and CCA back the 15 trout limt here was my answer

Because it was the right thing to do

Lol, the real answer to that question is....
IMO CCA believed lowering the limits would also reduce the fishing pressure; call me selfish but I was a fan of less boats on Big Lake.

Unfortunately the reduced limit didn't releive the pressure.

These are my opinions only.

["W"]

Originally Posted by B-Stealth

Lol, the real answer to that question is....
IMO CCA believed lowering the limits would also reduce the fishing pressure; call me selfish but I was a fan of less boats on Big Lake.

Unfortunately the reduced limit didn't releive the pressure.

These are my opinions only.

Lower limits don't decrease fishing pressure it increase pressure .

More have a chance to say "hey we limited out"

[DaPointIsDaBomb]

They need to limit the amount of guides. Used to wasn't many guides on big lake. Now a 100

[Baychamp1]

Originally Posted by "W"

Lower limits don't decrease fishing pressure it increase pressure .

More have a chance to say "hey we limited out"

Lower limits, you guides make same money, less time on water = more money for you on an hourly basis. Didn't you initially support lower limits? If I had a guide service, I probably would, makes good business sense, just sayin.

["W"]

Originally Posted by Baychamp1

Lower limits, you guides make same money, less time on water = more money for you on an hourly basis. Didn't you initially support lower limits? If I had a guide service, I probably would, makes good business sense, just sayin.

I don't care about hours on the water , if my people want to fish from sun up to sun down we are fishing

I had limits at 7:45am and 8:3oam of trout last week and we still fished one day till 3pm ??

[MathGeek]

Originally Posted by Baychamp1

Lower limits, you guides make same money, less time on water = more money for you on an hourly basis. Didn't you initially support lower limits? If I had a guide service, I probably would, makes good business sense, just sayin.

W never supported lower limits.

[noodle creek]

Originally Posted by B-Stealth

Lol, the real answer to that question is....
IMO CCA believed lowering the limits would also reduce the fishing pressure; call me selfish but I was a fan of less boats on Big Lake.

Unfortunately the reduced limit didn't releive the pressure.

These are my opinions only.

^^^One of dumbest statements I've read on this site in years.

[Goooh]

Originally Posted by noodle creek

^^^One of dumbest statements I've read on this site in years.

Have you been over to the bull red Cookoff thread?

[eman]

Originally Posted by B-Stealth

Lol, the real answer to that question is....
IMO CCA believed lowering the limits would also reduce the fishing pressure; call me selfish but I was a fan of less boats on Big Lake.

Unfortunately the reduced limit didn't releive the pressure.

These are my opinions only.

That statement should read. A bunch of guides believed that lowering the limits would reduce The number of Texas waders that came over and caught stringers of BIG trout aka fishing pressure. CCA backed them up w/ no clear facts that this would happen.

[MathGeek]

CCA: Bringing LA $$$ back to TX for expensive conservation efforts.