15 Trout Limit Discussion PUBLIC

["W"]

Originally Posted by ckinchen

This looks familiar to me, I think I may have seen it before.....

Now I remember, this is exactly what W did with his close political friend (an office angler I'm sure) Dan Morrish and the oyster issue.

flip / flop - flip / flop

You and crawfish have more in common that just being short.

So answer me this

your telling me that I dont spend more time on the water than 90% of people active with this site?

your telling me that people who spend less time acutally on the water know more about our fishery than me??

Please to tell

[redaddiction]

Originally Posted by "W"

So answer me this

your telling me that I dont spend more time on the water than 90% of people active with this site?

your telling me that people who spend less time acutally on the water know more about our fishery than me??

Please to tell

Who care's who spends more time. Quit being an a-hole!!. Everyone here agrees with you about the fishery. It shouldn't have been changed. We all know that. BUT, no one wants to be on your side publicly because of how you are acting. You are just isolating yourself from the rest of us. That's no way to get things done.

[ckinchen]

Originally Posted by redaddiction

Who care's who spends more time. Quit being an a-hole!!. Everyone here agrees with you about the fishery. It shouldn't have been changed. We all know that. BUT, no one wants to be on your side publicly because of how you are acting. You are just isolating yourself from the rest of us. That's no way to get things done.

Exactly, well said.

[Duck Butter]

Originally Posted by redaddiction

Who care's who spends more time. Quit being an a-hole!!. Everyone here agrees with you about the fishery. It shouldn't have been changed. We all know that. BUT, no one wants to be on your side publicly because of how you are acting. You are just isolating yourself from the rest of us. That's no way to get things done.

This^^^

I am not a stakeholder in Big Lake other than I like to fish there, but when a select few can make new laws without scientific evidence or listening to authorities, it stinks. I would totally be in favor of getting the limit back to 25 on Big Lake, even though it likely will not have ANY effect on growing larger fish, more fish, climate change, prices of rice in China, etc.., but totally FOR changing it back, because there was absolutely no reason to change it in the first place, BUT being very childish about who catches more fish, who knows more because they spend more time on the water, etc ain't gonna cut it. In total support of helping however I can to push the limit change back and passing some sort of legislation that wildlife 'owned' by the public, to be managed by the authorities (biologists) and not from political pressure. If you want to go that route, there would be many more people wanting to help in the quest, but going in there with a huge chip on your shoulder ain't gonna help the cause. Being a good fisherman doesn't mean you are a fisheries biologist, most fisheries biologists have probably never put a boat in Big Lake but I promise you, most of them KNOW whats better for the fishery than W, just by looking at data from the lake. This is the very reason I don't want to have a part in public wildlife management, 1 out of every 4 people thinks they are an expert

[Feesherman]

Originally Posted by Duck Butter

1 out of every 4 people thinks they are an expert

More like 3 of 4 thinks they are an expert and if you don't believe them just ask. They will give you their opinion and state it as fact because they cannot be wrong!

[Duck Butter]

Originally Posted by Feesherman

More like 3 of 4 thinks they are an expert and if you don't believe them just ask. They will give you their opinion and state it as fact because they cannot be wrong!

Very true, even the 6 year olds can tell the age of the deers!

[ckinchen]

Originally Posted by "W"

So answer me this

your telling me that I dont spend more time on the water than 90% of people active with this site?

your telling me that people who spend less time acutally on the water know more about our fishery than me??

Please to tell

Tell me this, who cares? I mean besides you of course, trout fishing is clearly your number one priority in life.

If we all acknowledge that you spend more time on the water than anyone on this site other than the 57 or so guides that work out of big lake, what does that prove? You must have won several big tournaments on big lake given this wisdom you have obtained right? Nope, you are you tied with the office boys, sitting on a zero. Actually we should probably ask Evis what should be done, he consistently wins or places in the top five. Has he just spent more time on the water than you or is he just better?

Do you have a degree in Marine Biology? Truth be told, the guys you hate that you call office fishermen are far from it. As a matter of fact the guy I know that was involved fishes more than you do and has more money invested in the lake than you. Are you more qualified than he is to decide the fate of the trout limit?

Why keep this up, most people want to see the limit increased because like Salty said people inherently want more. Get with Math Geek and print out what you have and whatever you want to add and see what the powers that be have to say about it.

As far as you smashing 6,000 members and your flip/flop past being pointed out which you have not even tried to refute, that is collateral damage that comes with you running your mouth. I stand up for the people of this site, I always have and I always will. I got trashed on LAS last week for doing just that. It is what it is.

Good day.

[Salty]

Originally Posted by ckinchen

Tell me this, who cares? I mean besides you of course, trout fishing is clearly your number one priority in life.

If we all acknowledge that you spend more time on the water than anyone on this site other than the 57 or so guides that work out of big lake, what does that prove? You must have won several big tournaments on big lake given this wisdom you have obtained right? Nope, you are you tied with the office boys, sitting on a zero. Actually we should probably ask Evis what should be done, he consistently wins or places in the top five. Has he just spent more time on the water than you or is he just better?

Do you have a degree in Marine Biology? Truth be told, the guys you hate that you call office fishermen are far from it. As a matter of fact the guy I know the was involved fishes more than you do and has more money invested in the lake than you. Are you more qualified than he is to decide the fate of the trout limit?

Why keep this up, most people want to see the limit increased because like Salty said people inherently want more. Get with Math Geek and print out what you have and whatever you want to add and see what the powers that be have to say about it.

As far as you smashing 6,000 members and your flip/flop past being pointed out which you have not even tried to refute, that is collateral damage that comes with you running your mouth. I stand up for the people of this site, I always have and I always will. I got trashed on LAS last week for doing just that. It is what it is.

Good day.

Thanks alot, Casey. I just dropped my cigarette and burnt a hole in my newest OU shirt.

["W"]

Originally Posted by ckinchen

Tell me this, who cares? I mean besides you of course, trout fishing is clearly your number one priority in life.

If we all acknowledge that you spend more time on the water than anyone on this site other than the 57 or so guides that work out of big lake, what does that prove? You must have won several big tournaments on big lake given this wisdom you have obtained right? Nope, you are you tied with the office boys, sitting on a zero. Actually we should probably ask Evis what should be done, he consistently wins or places in the top five. Has he just spent more time on the water than you or is he just better?

Do you have a degree in Marine Biology? Truth be told, the guys you hate that you call office fishermen are far from it. As a matter of fact the guy I know that was involved fishes more than you do and has more money invested in the lake than you. Are you more qualified than he is to decide the fate of the trout limit?

Why keep this up, most people want to see the limit increased because like Salty said people inherently want more. Get with Math Geek and print out what you have and whatever you want to add and see what the powers that be have to say about it.

As far as you smashing 6,000 members and your flip/flop past being pointed out which you have not even tried to refute, that is collateral damage that comes with you running your mouth. I stand up for the people of this site, I always have and I always will. I got trashed on LAS last week for doing just that. It is what it is.

Good day.

Please fill this out and fax it back to me

[ckinchen]

Originally Posted by "W"

Please fill this out and fax it back to me

Is this the form you complete before or after you figure 8 an unsuspecting office fishermen?

[Top Dawg]

Originally Posted by ckinchen

Is this the form you complete before or after you figure 8 an unsuspecting office fishermen?

Lmao

["W"]

Originally Posted by ckinchen

Is this the form you complete before or after you figure 8 an unsuspecting office fishermen?

I always give the one FINGER Salute to my victims:thefinger :

[Feesherman]

Originally Posted by "W"

So answer me this

your telling me that I dont spend more time on the water than 90% of people active with this site?

your telling me that people who spend less time acutally on the water know more about our fishery than me??

Please to tell

No, he is just calling out your total inconsistencies. First you said 99% of us don know nuttin cause we office fisherman. Then you changed it to say that office fisherman or the ones that went to baton rouge. And then when you were reminded that you said we were all retards and you were God, you jumped back on dat band wagon and looked for reassurance that you were in fact God!

[ckinchen]

Originally Posted by Feesherman

No, he is just calling out your total inconsistencies. First you said 99% of us don know nuttin cause we office fisherman. Then you changed it to say that office fisherman or the ones that went to baton rouge. And then when you were reminded that you said we were all retards and you were God, you jumped back on dat band wagon and looked for reassurance that you were in fact God!

And now because he knows he is toast he is ignoring all of the posts that point out his issues and focusing on T shirts. But in his little mind I am certain that he believe he is "winning".