Triple tail limit coming

["W"]

Duck Butter do I need to start another poll?? 3Tail are not a real target fish!!

80% on this site has never caught one....

more sheephead come to the landing than 3tail in a years time

[Duck Butter]

Originally Posted by "W"

Duck Butter do I need to start another poll?? 3Tail are not a real target fish!!

80% on this site has never caught one....

more sheephead come to the landing than 3tail in a years time

And probably way less have actually caught 5 in one trip

which is EXACTLY what is amazing to me that there are that many people concerned about a fish they never target

["W"]

Originally Posted by Duck Butter

And probably way less have actually caught 5 in one trip

which is EXACTLY what is amazing to me that there are that many people concerned about a fish they never target

Because this is where it starts!!! Like I said next in line will be State wide 15 trout limit and then 10 Trout limit and then 5 Trout limit

3tail are not a fish that people just leave dock and say: lets hammer the shi t out of them today and "DO"

I have not caught over 5 this year...I have caught 1 but when I do go offshore and find that grass line and they have 200 of them, I want enough to last me a few fish frys

[Duck Butter]

Originally Posted by "W"

Because this is where it starts!!! Like I said next in line will be State wide 15 trout limit and then 10 Trout limit and then 5 Trout limit

3tail are not a fish that people just leave dock and say: lets hammer the shi t out of them today and "DO"

I have not caught over 5 this year...I have caught 1 but when I do go offshore and find that grass line and they have 200 of them, I want enough to last me a few fish frys

This is the same mentality that just drove that entire ammo and gun craze we just experienced and not one thing happened but ammo and gun prices went thru the roof This is the LDWF for lord's sake, why in the world would they do anything to decrease the amount of fishermen - they won't. They work FOR us 100%, this isn't the federal gov't

Five 18"+ tripletail will last you a few fish frys, its not even law yet so go and catch 200 of em

[Spunt Drag]

Originally Posted by Duck Butter

This is the same mentality that just drove that entire ammo and gun craze we just experienced and not one thing happened but ammo and gun prices went thru the roof This is the LDWF for lord's sake, why in the world would they do anything to decrease the amount of fishermen - they won't. They work FOR us 100%, this isn't the federal gov't

Five 18"+ tripletail will last you a few fish frys, its not even law yet so go and catch 200 of em

[Top Dawg]

Originally Posted by Spunt Drag

I KNOW!!!!!

[MathGeek]

Originally Posted by Duck Butter

And probably way less have actually caught 5 in one trip

which is EXACTLY what is amazing to me that there are that many people concerned about a fish they never target

And why worry about the Nazi's killing the Jews if you are not a Jew?

They are proposing to convict people of crimes for keeping more than 5 tripletail. Should this be a crime any more than being a Jew should be a crime?

Prove it!!!

[Duck Butter]

Originally Posted by MathGeek

And why worry about the Nazi's killing the Jews if you are not a Jew?

They are proposing to convict people of crimes for keeping more than 5 tripletail. Should this be a crime any more than being a Jew should be a crime?

Prove it!!!

Never in the history of the world have these 3 words appeared in the same paragraph:


Nazis, Jews, and Tripletail


You win the internet today

[AceArcher]

Originally Posted by MathGeek

And why worry about the Nazi's killing the Jews if you are not a Jew?

They are proposing to convict people of crimes for keeping more than 5 tripletail. Should this be a crime any more than being a Jew should be a crime?

Prove it!!!

True,

But the purpose of this and the other thread is to first kill the support organization that ensured that the Jews were not hunted and persecuted, Thus leaving said Jew's without any protection. Sadly it's the Jew's and Jewish sympathizers who are leading the charge to kill this organization.

Perhaps if this thread were a discussion on what type of organization needs to succeed the CCA since they are becoming a bit wayward.....???

Instead of it just being a revolving anger door....

[MathGeek]

Originally Posted by AceArcher

Perhaps if this thread were a discussion on what type of organization needs to succeed the CCA since they are becoming a bit wayward.....???

Instead of it just being a revolving anger door....

I think that's the other thread mainly ... but this thread is also pointing out that a good conservation organization would steadfastly adhere to the principle that regulations need to have their necessity demonstrated by sound science.

A good conservation organization should be committed to the Constitutional principles of liberty such that sportsman's liberties in pursuing and harvesting game should only be restricted with there is sound and compelling scientific data demonstrating a true conservation need. Regulations should not be based on the fear that the resource might not remain for future generations; they should be based on sound scientific data showing the resource cannot be sustained for future generations under current management practices.

Sustainable harvests and use of the resources should always be allowed, and the burden of proof for those proposing new regulations should always be on those proposing to impose new criminal penalties for liberties which have been previously enjoyed and unregulated.

[Montauk17]

Originally Posted by MathGeek

I think that's the other thread mainly ... but this thread is also pointing out that a good conservation organization would steadfastly adhere to the principle that regulations need to have their necessity demonstrated by sound science.

A good conservation organization should be committed to the Constitutional principles of liberty such that sportsman's liberties in pursuing and harvesting game should only be restricted with there is sound and compelling scientific data demonstrating a true conservation need. Regulations should not be based on the fear that the resource might not remain for future generations; they should be based on sound scientific data showing the resource cannot be sustained for future generations under current management practices.

Sustainable harvests and use of the resources should always be allowed, and the burden of proof for those proposing new regulations should always be on those proposing to impose new criminal penalties for liberties which have been previously enjoyed and unregulated.

Once again,you hit the nail on the head!

[AceArcher]

Originally Posted by MathGeek

I think that's the other thread mainly ... but this thread is also pointing out that a good conservation organization would steadfastly adhere to the principle that regulations need to have their necessity demonstrated by sound science.

A good conservation organization should be committed to the Constitutional principles of liberty such that sportsman's liberties in pursuing and harvesting game should only be restricted with there is sound and compelling scientific data demonstrating a true conservation need. Regulations should not be based on the fear that the resource might not remain for future generations; they should be based on sound scientific data showing the resource cannot be sustained for future generations under current management practices.

Sustainable harvests and use of the resources should always be allowed, and the burden of proof for those proposing new regulations should always be on those proposing to impose new criminal penalties for liberties which have been previously enjoyed and unregulated.

Certainly can agree with all of that. Now we just either need to force / cajole CCA into the above role. Or create / find an organization to fill that need.