Quote:
Originally Posted by Duck Butter
This is like reading the National Enquirer. Why is this even a story? There is always a person in disagreement with ANYTHING. Why not interview the other 99% of folks and get their opinions rather than the ONE who is against it?
Journalism has gone so far downhill, its why the current president got elected due to misinformation getting spread and a lack of journalistic integrity.
#draconiansanctions
|
That's why I said a name would be great with this story. If this is some Guy that spent his whole career just doing sampling or something, its no big deal.
But from the sounds of things, its not. This guy sounds like he was a biologist manager, possibly over the old marine fisheries program. This is a former biologist with an intimate knowledge of how WLF is set up.
Are you honestly saying this is misinformation? That this guy doesn't know what he's talking about? Sounds to me like he has a damn good idea of what he is talking about.
What's in a name? Famous question. A name gives these words a lot of weight. Or maybe not. Depends on the name.
Without a name, maybe its not a story. With a name, if could have blown this thing away.