In terms of anecdotal reports, I hear the same occurring in Venice and Lake P. MG, count yourself lucky to have the privelege to see some data that the press has been prohibited from seeing since 2011. As for as creel surveys, research on standardized oral interview validity is horrible. Many lie. Much better to have objective data. We need to have them counted in the cooler even when anglers say they didn't catch any. Same is true in AMA interview studies...haven't kept up with validity and reliability as such in field biological studies.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk
|