Quote:
Originally Posted by MathGeek
Yep, it gets offensive when math challenges the power that gov't types want to exercise, not just over natural resources, but over honest citizens who want enjoy and utilize those resources.
Don't you think 15 pages of deer regulations are enough? Do we really need additional regulations refining in more detail what is and is not allowed in each zone?
OK, so you're good with 10 zones, you just want each to have different harvest limits rather than regulating harvest numbers with open and closed dates. But the existing limit of six is a possession limit, rather than a harvest limit. A hunter who lived in zone 10 couldn't bring home six deer even if all six deer were shot on family hunting land in zone 3.
This scheme (limiting harvest numbers by kill limits rather than open dates) inevitably leads to much more complex and expensive tagging schemes, usually that connect tags with specific zones. So if you hunt in zone 10 and get invited to zone 3, you've got to buy a tag for that zone, etc. I kinda like it how it is now. At least the tagging scheme is simple. Six deer anywhere in the state.
|
The tagging system now sucks. Its not so much the system that sucks but its the tags. Leave it to our state to give you a tag with no way to attach it. Go deer hunting now and you gota stop at staples for a pen and home depot for some zip ties. Always thought about filling out a tag and shoving it in a deers azz. If the damn warden wants to see it he can get the damn tag himself.lmao. It is attached to the deer. F em if the don't like it.
