View Single Post
  #55  
Old 10-16-2013, 11:48 AM
MathGeek's Avatar
MathGeek MathGeek is offline
King Mackeral
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 2,931
Cash: 4,552
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Finfeatherfur View Post
Oh, that's right - neighbors called because he was whacked out carrying a kid waving a gun. It said officer "thought he saw" and that is all that is needed in a perceived threat.
You mean that the neighbors ***CLAIMED*** he was wacked out carrying a kid and waving a gun. This CLAIM was in no way corroborated.

We've reviewed a number of cases where the person making a complaint exaggerates the actions of an honest citizen who may or may not even be in possession of a gun. People who are afraid of armed citizens tend to want police on the scene quickly to deal with one. To facilitate this, they often exaggerate the bit about the gun. Sometimes they claim the gun was pointed at them when it never left the holster. Sometimes they claim that a gun is present based on knowledge of the individual as a gun owner, but without actually seeing a gun.

Hoplophobic complaints of exaggerated risks are a significant contributor to bad officer involved shootings. I do not think that experienced law enforcement officers are ignorant of the propensity for some complaintants to exaggerate the situation to get them on the scene quickly.

In the present case, it appears that an unarmed man was shot, and that all the guns were in the house. A good investigation should determine whether the complaintants lied about the man waving the gun, or whether he genuinely was waving a gun about and returned the gun to the home before police arrived. If this man's death resulted from exaggerated claims from hoplophobic neighbors, then I hope they face appropriate charges for making a false report.

Last edited by MathGeek; 10-16-2013 at 12:43 PM.
Reply With Quote