I would also.

I think you have a strong opinion and a nice theory but you have no facts or any scientific proof that the reduced limit is the cause of fewer big trout in the lake. Especially with the many variables in place now like oyster dredging and more fishing pressure. All that has to be taken into account. No scientific data suggested a reduced limit was neccesary and there is still no scientific data to suggest that it caused a reduced number of large trout.

Exactly right, well said.

Can those who target only large trout post up some pics? Or some numbers from the past years? Be very interesting to see.

So W, serious question...
What is your goal / time frame on trying to get the limit changed back to 25....

IMO, Chicken should be responsible for coming up with another interesting topic of conversation "cents" he was the one that put the "breaks" on this one.

:smokin:

Not trying to throw names out, but stulb catches plenty of big trout. Wish he would chime in on this thread.

sammich

and he's a real class act on the water...:cool:

LMAO....yall done pissed someone off.... Got a email that have yall by name....you know the office fisherman....who went to Baton Rouge..Lamar

This dude threw it down with dates, times, how voted what , who the puppets on the strings were....who is still a puppet on a string....the one who writes the checks to a organization.



Chicken ..its got a lot of names but its legit...can I post it...(I promise the ones who get butthurt should get it)

No way to tell how many big trout this dude catches because he doesn't start an internet thread every time he gets a bite. If I could choose someone to take me big trout fishing...he would be at the top of my list.

No on the positing names that are not public record. I do no think anyone disputes that the limit was changed by certain influential people with little to no scientific data. I know one gentlemen that was there and he freely admits it and is proud of it. If he wants to post his legal name on the Internet that is up to him. I want no part of invading people's privacy.

You show 'em, W....change it back. :rotfl:

Hercules Hercules

sammich

sammich

So W, really what are the odds that you can get it changed back to 25...

I have greater odds of winning the lottery and I don't even play. Lol


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

probably never but got some good info out

We solved 3 things
#1. The small group of office fisherman had zero proof but yet used data from a dying estuary to compare our lake

#2. Every Biologist said changing limits was a bad thing

#3 lack of big trout is due to overpopulation of trout

The Texas coast is a "dying estuary"? :rotfl: Go over to 2cool and post it there. Oh, that's right...you've been banned there, too.

You have proved absolutely nothing. You haven't even proved a shortage of big trout.